| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It can't just use the Element copy constructor, as there is aditional
stuff in the HTMLElement struct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This creates a new _dom_element_copy_internal() function, which does the
copying. The old _dom_element_copy() continues to do the allocation.
This follows the same pattern as in dom_node_internal class.
|
| |
|
|\ |
|
|/ |
|
|\ |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
There is a TODO in the code, indicating the set of unimplemented
HTMLElement specialisations. For now they fall back to HTMLElement.
|